Your conversations never train a model. Tenant-isolated, encrypted, yours.

ArcGlass Listen — AI Notetaker with Enterprise-Grade Security.

Get an executive review of your company conversations before you commit.

Competitive comparison

ArcGlass vs. Microsoft 365 Copilot

Last updated: September 27, 2026

ParentMicrosoft Corporation
Founded1975
HQRedmond, WA
Employees~223,000 (June 30, 2026)
FundingPublic (NASDAQ: MSFT)
Valuation / ARRFY26 revenue $331.8B; Microsoft 365 Copilot over 30M paid seats (July 2026)
PricingMicrosoft 365 Copilot is $30/user/month (annual) as an add-on to a qualifying Microsoft 365 plan. Copilot Business for under 300 users is $21/user/month ($18 promotional through Dec 2026). Microsoft 365 E7 bundles E5, Copilot and Agent 365 at $99/user/month. Copilot Chat is included at no extra cost with eligible plans. Copilot Studio capacity is $200 per 25,000 Copilot Credits per month, or pay as you go.
Notable customers EY KOHLER Barclays JCB

Company data compiled from public sources; figures are approximate and may have changed since publication.

Recent developments

TL;DR. Microsoft 365 Copilot is the AI assistant built into Outlook, Teams, Word, Excel and the rest of Microsoft 365, grounded in each user's own email, meetings, chats and files. For many companies it is already licensed, and for one meeting recap, a quick question across your inbox, or a drafted follow-up, it is enough. ArcGlass is a post-conversation intelligence layer: it reads every meeting, call, email and chat on a standing basis, keeps structured history, and tells leaders which accounts need attention, how reps are trending, and what messaging lands. The honest pitch is not "replace Copilot." It is: keep Copilot for the ad-hoc work, and add ArcGlass for the analysis nobody has time to ask for every week.

Strategic positioning

 ArcGlassMicrosoft 365 Copilot
BuyerCOO and CEO, plus CMO, VP Sales, RevOps, Customer SuccessCIO and IT, usually as a company-wide Microsoft 365 license decision
Headline value"Stay close to customers. Without sitting in every meeting."An AI assistant for every employee, grounded in their work data (Work IQ)
Center of gravityEvery customer conversation, analyzed without anyone asking, rolled up for leadersThe individual user's flow of work in Outlook, Teams and Office apps
Primary dataMeetings, calls, email and chat across Teams, Outlook/Exchange, Zoom, Meet, Gmail, Slack, Gong and notetakersMicrosoft Graph: the user's email, calendar, meetings, chats and files, plus connectors and CRM for the Sales agent
OutputDaily briefing, account health trends, rep coaching memory, messaging and positioning analysisAnswers, recaps, drafts, documents, and custom agents
Recent directionLeadership reads across the account book, messaging and positioning analysis, a free desktop notetaker (Listen)Agents at scale: Work IQ, Agent 365, Researcher and Analyst, the E7 bundle

Copilot works for the person asking, inside the apps they already use, with the data they can already see. ArcGlass works for the leader who needs a standing read on every customer conversation, whether or not anyone asked. Copilot is the assistant. ArcGlass is the standing analysis.

Overlap surface

1. Meeting recap Copilot wins

If your meetings run on Teams, Copilot's recap is right where people already are.

For "what happened in that one meeting," Copilot in Teams is enough. ArcGlass earns its place when you want the pattern across hundreds of meetings.

2. Ad-hoc questions across email, meetings and files Copilot wins

3. Always-on account signals ArcGlass wins

This is the core of the build vs. buy question.

You can build this on Copilot Studio. The question is whether you want to own that project.

4. Leadership briefing across the account book ArcGlass wins

5. Messaging and positioning across accounts ArcGlass wins

6. Rep coaching memory ArcGlass wins

7. Data handling and training policy Tie on training, Microsoft ahead on compliance

Both commit not to train models on your data. Microsoft's compliance footprint is far larger.

8. Access scoping Different models

Neither is better in general. They answer different questions: "what can this person open" versus "what should this manager see about their team."

9. Cost and setup Depends on what you already own

10. Extensibility and ecosystem Copilot wins

Coverage areas only one side has

Only ArcGlass

  • Standing analysis of every connected conversation, without anyone prompting it
  • Account health (At risk, Watch, On track) with a one-line reason, trended from weekly snapshots
  • Daily "Act now / Watch / Working" briefing and a week-over-week "What's changed" view
  • Per-rep coaching memory and trends over time
  • Messaging analysis and positioning (claims vs. differentiators customers raise unprompted)
  • Product Signals and Customer Questions rolled up across conversations with evidence links
  • Reporting-tree access scoping built around the org chart
  • One view across Teams plus Zoom, Meet, Gmail, Slack, Gong and third-party notetakers
  • Listen: free desktop notetaker with no meeting bot and on-device transcription

Only Microsoft 365 Copilot

  • AI assistant inside Outlook, Teams, Word, Excel and PowerPoint for every employee
  • Teams intelligent recap with chapters, speaker markers, video recap and audio recap (preview)
  • Drafting documents, emails and presentations
  • Researcher and Analyst agents for multi-step research and data analysis
  • Sales agent with CRM context from Dynamics 365 or Salesforce inside Outlook and Teams
  • Copilot Studio, Work IQ APIs and Agent 365 for building and governing custom agents
  • EU Data Boundary, data residency commitments and Microsoft's full compliance portfolio
  • Often already licensed, including in Microsoft 365 E7
  • Mobile apps

Takeaways

  1. Copilot is enough for a lot of this. One meeting recap, a question across your inbox, a drafted follow-up, a research pass before a QBR: Copilot does these well, inside tools people already use. If that is the whole need, you do not need ArcGlass.
  2. The gap is the question nobody asks. Copilot is excellent when someone knows what to ask. ArcGlass is for the signals nobody thought to ask about: the account that went quiet, the objection now showing up in five deals, the rep whose calls changed this month.
  3. Permissions shape what a leader can see. Copilot shows each user what they can already open, which is the right default. A leadership read across every rep's conversations needs a system designed for that view, with scoping by reporting tree.
  4. Building it yourself is possible. Copilot Studio and the Work IQ APIs are real platforms. If you have the team to design the schema, keep history, tune the scoring and maintain it, you can build much of this. ArcGlass is the option for teams that would rather buy it.
  5. If you're choosing between them: pick Microsoft 365 Copilot if our problem is "people spend too long on email, meeting notes, documents and finding information," and we already run on Microsoft 365. Pick ArcGlass if our problem is "leadership has no standing read on what customers are telling us, which accounts are slipping, and how the team is delivering the message." This is the common pattern. Copilot for each person's ad-hoc work in Outlook and Teams; ArcGlass reading the same Teams meetings and Outlook/Exchange mail for the standing analysis leaders review each week.

How ArcGlass thinks about the overlap

We spent a long time at Microsoft and have a lot of respect for what Microsoft 365 Copilot does. We do not position ArcGlass as a Copilot replacement. If your team lives in Outlook and Teams, Copilot is probably the right assistant for them.

ArcGlass does one narrower job: it reads the customer conversations your team already has, on Teams, Outlook and Exchange and everywhere else, and tells leaders what is working, what needs attention, and what to change in the message. It does that every day without anyone asking, and it keeps the history so trends are visible. That is the part that is hard to get from an assistant, and it is the part we built.

Sources

  1. Microsoft 365 Copilot enterprise pricing (accessed 2026-09-27)
  2. Microsoft 365 Copilot business plans and pricing (accessed 2026-09-27)
  3. Microsoft Copilot Studio plans and pricing (accessed 2026-09-27)
  4. M365 E7 to launch May 1 for $99 per user per month (Directions on Microsoft) (accessed 2026-09-27)
  5. Intelligent recap for Teams calls, meetings, and events (Microsoft Learn) (accessed 2026-09-27)
  6. Sales agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot FAQ (Microsoft Learn) (accessed 2026-09-27)
  7. Data, privacy, and security for Microsoft 365 Copilot (Microsoft Learn) (accessed 2026-09-27)
  8. Announcing the new Work IQ APIs (Microsoft 365 Blog, June 2, 2026) (accessed 2026-09-27)
  9. Microsoft Ignite 2025: Copilot and agents built to power the Frontier Firm (accessed 2026-09-27)
  10. Researcher and Analyst are now generally available in Microsoft 365 Copilot (accessed 2026-09-27)
  11. Microsoft Cloud and AI strength fuels fourth quarter results (July 29, 2026) (accessed 2026-09-27)
  12. Microsoft headcount falls for first time in a decade (GeekWire, 2026) (accessed 2026-09-27)
  13. EY redefines CRM with Dynamics 365 Sales and Sales Agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot (accessed 2026-09-27)
  14. KOHLER achieves 98% Microsoft 365 Copilot adoption (accessed 2026-09-27)
  15. Barclays to roll out Microsoft 365 Copilot to 100,000 colleagues (accessed 2026-09-27)
  16. JCB boosts work efficiency with adoption of Microsoft 365 Copilot (accessed 2026-09-27)

Questions about this comparison? Reach out at hello@arcglass.io — we're happy to dig into specifics for your stack.